Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:31

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Judge rejects Newsom’s emergency request to limit Trump LA troop deployment - The Hill
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Denver Health sees increase in people getting MMR vaccine - 9News
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Popular chicken chain shares, massive expansion plan - TheStreet
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why does the God of the Bible condemn homosexual acts?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
How the Indiana Pacers Spun Style Into Substance - The Ringer